Effects of high-profile crossover feet on gait biomechanics in 2 individuals with Syme amputation.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic treatment options for people with ankle disarticulation (i.e., Syme amputation) are limited. Prosthetic feet designed for people with Syme amputation are often low profile to accommodate build-height restrictions, resulting in decreased energy return during gait. High-profile crossover feet that attach to the posterior proximal aspect of the prosthetic socket can bypass these restrictions and may promote a more physiologic gait pattern. OBJECTIVES: To compare level-ground gait biomechanics and patient-reported outcomes between crossover and traditional energy-storing feet in people with Syme amputation. STUDY DESIGN: Within-participant pilot study. METHODS: Both participants were fit with energy-storing and crossover feet and were randomized to the order they used the feet. Participants used each foot for 2 weeks before assessment. Step length symmetry, prosthetic ankle range of motion, prosthetic-side energy return, and peak sound-side loading were determined from motion capture data obtained in a laboratory. Mobility and balance confidence were measured using standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Foot preference was assessed with an ad hoc survey. RESULTS: Two participants with Syme amputations completed the study. Prosthetic ankle peak dorsiflexion and push-off power increased with the crossover foot compared with the energy-storing foot for both participants. Both participants reported an overall preference of the crossover foot. Changes in patient-reported outcomes did not exceed published minimum detectable change values. CONCLUSION: Crossover feet increased prosthetic ankle range of motion and energy return compared with traditional energy-storing feet in this pilot investigation of 2 participants. Crossover feet seem to promote physiologic gait and may be a promising alternative to traditional low-profile feet for people with Syme amputation.

Comprehensive dynamic and kinematic analysis of the rodent hindlimb during over ground walking.

The rat hindlimb is a frequently utilized pre-clinical model system to evaluate injuries and pathologies impacting the hindlimbs. These studies have demonstrated the translational potential of this model but have typically focused on the force generating capacity of target muscles as the primary evaluative outcome. Historically, human studies investigating extremity injuries and pathologies have utilized biomechanical analysis to better understand the impact of injury and extent of recovery. In this study, we expand that full biomechanical workup to a rat model in order to characterize the spatiotemporal parameters, ground reaction forces, 3-D joint kinematics, 3-D joint kinetics, and energetics of gait in healthy rats. We report data on each of these metrics that meets or exceeds the standards set by the current literature and are the first to report on all these metrics in a single set of animals. The methodology and findings presented in this study have significant implications for the development and clinical application of the improved regenerative therapeutics and rehabilitative therapies required for durable and complete functional recovery from extremity traumas, as well as other musculoskeletal pathologies.

Analysis and Modeling of Rat Gait Biomechanical Deficits in Response to Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury.

There is currently a substantial volume of research underway to develop more effective approaches for the regeneration of functional muscle tissue as treatment for volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury, but few studies have evaluated the relationship between injury and the biomechanics required for normal function. To address this knowledge gap, the goal of this study was to develop a novel method to quantify the changes in gait of rats with tibialis anterior (TA) VML injuries. This method should be sensitive enough to identify biomechanical and kinematic changes in response to injury as well as during recovery. Control rats and rats with surgically-created VML injuries were affixed with motion capture markers on the bony landmarks of the back and hindlimb and were recorded walking on a treadmill both prior to and post-surgery. Data collected from the motion capture system was exported for post-hoc analysis in OpenSim and Matlab. In vivo force testing indicated that the VML injury was associated with a significant deficit in force generation ability. Analysis of joint kinematics showed significant differences at all three post-surgical timepoints and gait cycle phase shifting, indicating augmented gait biomechanics in response to VML injury. In conclusion, this method identifies and quantifies key differences in the gait biomechanics and joint kinematics of rats with VML injuries and allows for analysis of the response to injury and recovery. The comprehensive nature of this method opens the door for future studies into dynamics and musculoskeletal control of injured gait that can inform the development of regenerative technologies focused on the functional metrics that are most relevant to recovery from VML injury.